Master NLP

January 2nd, 2012
{ Add Comment }

With our Master NLP Program, you'll see yourself rocket into a new philosophy of thinking and being around NLP.

We've been around for a while now, so have had the time to develop the Master Practitioner series into a refined mixture of superb techniques and experiential experimentation, to take your NLP and life confidence to higher levels.

Here's what people have said recently about their own experiences:

"Terry, thank you so much for a wonderful training session. I am flying so high I don't think I'll need to use BA to get to Tampa this week! Before, I knew that I could be a great NLP Practitioner but I didn't know it, now I do. Thanks again. See ya Viv" Vivien Melanie

"Thanks again for last weekend.  Only one word - awesome!  The real description is somewhere in the Infinite Cosmos...... Anyway, I got to playing with whether I could make it to the next Module 3 - what if I did / what if I didn't / for what purpose not going, and concluded that I HAD to be there". Adrian Munday

"Can I just say a huge thank you to both you and Adam, I was just saying to Amanda what a wonderful experience it has been to have gone through the course.  I still find it spooky how powerful intention can be and if ever I needed another convincer I have had another 3 people call me since Tuesday asking to set up interviews for jobs. Keep in touch. Love to you both!"
James Evans

With our new Master Practitioner NLP modular courses, you get not only brand new skill sets, yet a whole way of thinking that revolutionises what you attained from any NLP training you've already attended.

Click here to see the whole curriculum for the NLP Master Practitioner series

The Three Master Practitioner modules start again in March 2012.

Click here for dates and prices for 2012

It's your mind that creates this world - Buddha

December 26th, 2011
{ Add Comment }

"It's your mind that creates this world", Words, apparently from Buddha (or let's say Buddha energy at least). At this time of year, there is so much going on in the name of God, Christ and religion in general that for the 'unbelievers' there has to be other definitions to make sense of this period.

I found a piece that has an humorous angle as well as some decent facts to chew upon.

Paul said, “…we have the mind of Christ,” and Stephen Hawking has said he seeks the mind of God through physics and cosmology. Arthur Eddington, a famous astrophysicist of the earlier part of the twentieth century, said, “The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff,” and the book of Genesis repeatedly states that “God said, ‘Let there be ….,’” in describing creation. Who did He say it to? Apparently to Himself, and that makes these proclamations thoughts, albeit formally expressed thoughts. Expression, wherein the Godhead is concerned, is by way of the Person of God=s executive aspect, the Second Person of the Trinity, the Word, the Logos, the Son, Jesus.

Sir James Jeans

Similarly, Sir James Jeans, a physicist and mathematician who worked with astronomer Edwin Hubble (who discovered that our universe is expanding and was honoured several years ago in having a well-known space telescope named after him), said, “The universe begins to look more like a great thought than a great machine. Mind no longer appears as an accidental intruder into the realm of matter; we are beginning to suspect that we ought rather to hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter….We discover that the universe shows evidence of a designing or controlling power that has something in common with our own individual minds….” Here we have a scientist of excellence bothering to express that which had been impressed upon him by years of searching the heavens and trying to find a common denominator for all he observed. And he came up with Mind. (My book, Things Are Not As They Seem, explains why I strongly believe that mind is primary in the universe, much more so than space, time or matter.)

Interesting to say the least. Read on.....

Nils Bohr

Cecil B. DeMille said, “Let the divine mind flow through your mind, and you will be happier. I have found the greatest power in the world in the power of prayer. There is no shadow of doubt of that. I speak from my own experience.” Even the pessimistic philosopher, Schopenhauer, thought of the universe in terms of will and idea. Then, most piercing – I am struggling to resist more emotional and melodramatic words – we have a recent trend among theoretical physicists, initiated by the late John Archibald Wheeler of Princeton, to regard the physical world as information, with energy and matter as incidentals! (I cannot recall who I am quoting here, but the explanation point is mine.) Here we have a man who was the dean of the theoretical physicists of the entire world, the mentor of two or three generations of scientists, including Richard Feynman and Hugh Everett III of the “Many Worlds Interpretation” of quantum physics, and who worked with both Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein, echoing Jeans= concept of the universe. It appears, moreover, that he arrived seventy years later at what amounts to the same opinion that Eddington had expressed in 1927, during the same year in which Hubble made his momentous discovery. And — Stephen Hawking, the best known theoretical physicist in the world today, essentially, it seems to me, expresses a belief which is the same as Wheeler’s in the following excerpt from A Brief History of Time: “Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Is the unified theory so compelling that it brings about its own existence? Or does it need a creator, and, if so, does he have any other effect on the universe? And who created him?”

C.S Lewis

When I combine the idea of the universe as information with all this supporting material, I feel overwhelmed, bowled over — with realization, clarity and reverence. I feel like C.S. Lewis must have on the specific day he was able to identify when He first felt certain about the existence of God; the day in which, in his thirties, he knelt and prayed for the first time since his childhood. (See his autobiography, Surprised By Joy.) Information is not synonymous with thought, with one exception. If the thinker is omniscient, His thought will be pure information. Also, we who are in the process of becoming what we will be in eternity are able to plan projects with our minds and then produce them using our minds and our extremities. How much more is an omnipotent Being — in fact Being itself — able to complete production of anything by way of nothing more than thought itself? I could hardly believe more strongly that the universe and all its contents, including us humans, is indeed information, which can only be the thought of a Great Mind, the Great Mind, the Greatest Mind, the true God, He of the Bible.

There can certainly be no information without an informer, and the Informer who endows us with the information, which is all the physical reality of which we are aware, can only be this one God, the Source of all goodness, reason and worthwhile information.

Michelangelo

Michelangelo seems to have expressed his belief in the primacy of mind in the universe when he painted God reaching out to Adam on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel against a background shaped exactly like a sagittal section of a human brain (as an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association of several years ago pointed out quite convincingly). In this masterpiece, he represents the creation of mind by Mind. Furthermore, Bishop George Berkeley, in the eighteenth century, said that any object is merely a bundle of perceptions — no matter how we struggle to claim it is really “out there,” existing independently, we know absolutely nothing of it except through our senses which feed into our minds. “Thus, even something as obtrusive as a hammer striking your thumb ultimately consists for you only of your brain’s interpretation of the pain impulses streaming up your arm to the parietal cortex and impulses via the retina and optic nerve to the occipital area of your cerebrum, as you watch in horror.@ (Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy.) Presaging Jeans= views of two centuries later, this theologian and philosopher of the 1700?s saw mind as primary in the universe, matter as shadowy in its existence, and our senses as undependable with regard to the revelation of ultimate reality. It is reason and faith that allows us to perceive this to the degree that it can be perceived.

Quite a bit earlier there was Xenophanes of Colophon, who lived during the sixth century B.C. in a town in ionian Greece near Miletus. He reasoned that the arche= is a single God, who moves all things by way of his Mind. (“Arche’” means Ruling Principle, the entity that got everything else going.) Finally, Aristotle, giant of study and thought, saw the Creator of all as the Unmoved Mover, whose sole activity he believed to be thought.

The primacy of mind in the universe also fits well with the mysteries of quantum mechanics, wherein our examining a system affects what happens in it, and it is possible, as I have written, that nothing can really happen until a cogent mind is aware of the event in question. (The following wonderful limerick appears in Frank J. Tipler’s book, The Physics of Immortality — which, if read, should be approached in a highly skeptical manner: “There once was a man who said, “God Must think it exceedingly odd If He finds that this tree Continues to be When there’s no one about in the Quad. Reply: Dear Sir: Your astonishment’s odd. I am always about in the Quad. And that’s why the tree Will continue to be, Since observed by Your’s faithfully, God.”) As DeMille said, God=s thought flows through our minds, when we allow, and, as Jeans put it, we have something in common with God=s Mind. The information of the Informer is all of reality except for the abstract. It streams from the Mind of the Beginner, He Who begot and maintains the world, He Who is uncreated Truth. The universe is the Thought of God.

Food for thought huh. Happy Christmas and new year. Remember, It's your mind that creates this Christmas and new year.

Your CPD points with NLP Coaching and Training

December 19th, 2011
{ Add Comment }

NLP World qualifies you to a certain amount of CPD (Continuing Professional Development) points towards a number of qualifications, including coaching & Mentoring certification.

This means you can become a qualified coach quite soon after completing an NLP course with CPD points at the completion.

You'll gain CPD points every time you attend an NLP training or complete an online NLP coaching course with us.

The Coaching Society has criteria for your NLP Coaching certification. We have listed these below:

At The Coaching Society (TCS), we recognise various different training methods to becoming skilled at working with people. TCS recognises Neuro Linguistic Programming (online and face to face), Time Based Techniques, Hypnosis , Meta-Medicine, Spiral Dynamics, Sports Psychology, Psychology, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), as well as some other therapies, as good practice for coaching skills.

You can use up to 80% of your specific training categories towards your certification as an accredited coach. Therefore from 100 hours of coaching hours required, you can spend up to 80 hours on any of the above training towards you certification.We require at least 20 hours of core coaching competencies in addition to this. You can acquire these hours from recommended online courses or other recommended coaching companies.

Combined with the training hours, we insist on you having at least ten coaching clients, with well kept notes and feedback from those clients.

Therefore if you took the 7 day NLP Practitioner course with NLP World, you'd have eighty hours out of your 100 hours needed and just need to top that up with another twenty (from master practitioner or our  online course) and you will be eligible for certification.

So if you are thinking of becoming a certified and accredited coach, you can more or less do that through taking our NLP training, plus either the NLP Master Practitioner (we would include online coaching training for free), or simply taking our online NLP coaching program.

Simple.

You can visit The Coaching Society by clicking here.

Life Coaching

December 12th, 2011
{ Add Comment }

Life coaching is the art of directing someone's attention to areas that they have missed, thus becoming the enlightenment for their blind spots.

Some people recently have been asking about the link between NLP and life coaching. I hope to answer those questions in this article.

I was already doing life coaching when I came across NLP. My first impression of NLP was witnessing one of my flat mates being relieved of an allergy to cats in about 20 minutes. There was no coaching manual around on how to do that trick!

Then I had one session from an NLP practitioner and released a memory that had been stopping me for about a year to get on with my life. There also was no page found in the coaching manual of how you do that in one hour!

So I grew to know the difference between an NLP practitioner and a life coach. As a life coach, I would expect to have a number of session over an agreed amount of time with a specific outcome in mind. This maybe as many as ten or more sessions.

I would set some goals an have the client agree to terms and conditions: Then we'd start to delve into what to do and how to do it. These days there are some methods which have caught on. One of these is the G.R.O.W. model :

The GROW Model as described here applies to an individual session, but part of its strength is that it can equally well be applied to a part of a session, or to a series of sessions. In each case, the principle is the same.

Firstly, a session must have a Goal or outcome to be achieved. The goal should be as specific as possible and it must be possible to measure whether it has been achieved. So, having identified the goal, questions like "How will you know that you have achieved that goal?" are useful here.

As well as knowing where you are trying to get to, you need to know where you are starting from - the Current Reality. It is surprising how often this is the key part of a coaching session and that by just seeing clearly the situation (rather than what was thought or imagined to be the situation), the resolution becomes obvious and straightforward.

Once you know where you are and where you want to go, the next step is to explore what Options you have for getting there. A useful metaphor for GROW is a map: once you know where you are going (the goal) and where you are (current reality), you can explore possible ways of making the journey (options) and choose the best.

But this in itself is not enough - you must also have the motivation or Will to make the journey. The "W" is often taken to stand for a number of other elements of a session, all of which are important. Myles Downey in his book "Effective Coaching" suggests it stands for "Wrap-up"; others have it standing for What, Where, Why, When and How. But whatever is emphasised, the desired outcome from this stage is a commitment to action.

The GROW acronym suggests that a coach using the GROW model is likely to start by asking the client to set goals, both for what they want to get out of the coaching sessions as a whole and for each individual session.

Using the GROW Model, the coach will begin the discussion by asking the client to define the topic in order to understand what specifically the client wants to talk about, the scale of the challenges they face, the importance and emotional significance of the topic to the client and the client’s long-term vision or goal.

Most coaches will encourage clients to set goals which are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Aligned, Realistic and Time-framed) the idea being that this will assist the client in focusing their thoughts and will also enable them to measure whether they achieve what they are aiming for in the long-term.

In the ‘Reality’ stage of the GROW Model the coach will assist the client in assessing objectively where they currently are in relation to their goal and how they feel about their current situation. This process of discovery is designed to allow the help the client clarify their goals better and as they begin to understand them more deeply what is driving them and what their sources of dissatisfaction are. In summary both coach and client encourage self-assessment and offer explicit examples to demonstrate their points and paint the most accurate picture of the topic as possible.

In the ‘Options’ stage of the GROW Model the idea is not to find a solution immediately, but to generate as many alternative courses of action as possible. Once a number of options have been identified the next stage will be to decide which one the client wants to put into action to help move them towards their goals. In this final ‘Will’ stage of the GROW Model the coach/client relationship is moving from discussion to conclusion and achievement.

One thing to point out here is that this method is appealing to the conscious mind. The contrast with NLP is that NLP is very much directed at the unconscious mind.

Therefore when an NLP practitioner asks questions, they may not be so much listening to the exact words but the reaction to the questions and the associations the client pulls out. If they are good, they also realise that every question should be intimately provided on a carrier wave of intention to heat seek true answers... perhaps answers the client didn't even know existed before the question was uttered!

So then what is a coaching model?

A coaching model is a framework, it does not tell you how to coach but rather it's the underlying structure that you can use for when you're coaching someone.

It's like having a high level strategy that allows you to "see the battlefield," therefore increasing your ability to respond adequately to whatever coaching situation you're faced with.

Learning from different coaching models has definite value, as no one model has all of the answers to all of the challenges you'll be faced with as a coach.

Why are there so many coaching models?

Coaching integrates many fields of knowledge, so it's likely that many theories and models were adapted for coaching. This also means that you have a broader base to learn from.

Having many models available can actually help you when you're creating your own model. Provided you have a way for doing so, that is.

What do most coaching models have in common?

Most coaching approaches share some things in common:

The establishment of a relationship that's built on trust, unfeigned communication and confidentiality.

The formulation of client-based, agreed upon goals and expectations.

A deep questioning and learning dynamic in relation to people's goals.

By learning and understanding each model's commonalities, you can then integrate and effectively create your approach.

Not one model, but many...

Motivational Interviewing - MI is a process that helps solve ambivalence and bring about change.

GROW - A widely used methodology for achieving goals.

SUCCESS - Another coaching model to add to your coaching repertoire.

STEPPPA - This model focuses on your emotions to achieve goals.

WHAT - This model allows you to ask the right questions, it's a simple yet effective strategy towards finding a solution.

When it comes down to qualifications and kudos, it really doesn't matter which model you have been brought up on - it matters whether you can take a client from their point A to their desired point.

That's why I've gone down the NLP coaching route. NLP coaching cares about results, not if you were wearing the right tie when you met someone.

And the manual for clearing out an allergy or phobia in under fifteen minutes has not been written anywhere yet apart from in the NLP World.

Here's some good news for people considering taking up a coaching career. NLP World gives you NLP CPD points which count towards your coaching certification. We have teamed up with The Coaching Society to allow NLP and some other techniques to count towards an accredited certification.

You can use up to 80% of your specific training categories towards your certification as an accredited coach. Therefore from 100 hours of coaching hours required, you can spend up to 80 hours on any of the above (NLP etc.) training towards you certification. The Coaching Society (TCS) require at least 20 hours of core coaching competencies in addition to this. You can acquire these hours from further NLP training or recommended online courses or other recommended coaching companies.

You can visit The Coaching Society by going to www.thecoachingsociety.com

NLP World can be found at www.nlpworld.co.uk

Free NLP Videos - Conversational Anchoring

December 5th, 2011
{ Add Comment }

With this theme of free NLP Videos, we are going to have a look at NLP Conversational Anchoring .

Conversational anchoring is the newest version of how to transfer states from one place to another or how to link high states to old negativities and collapse them.

Part one is about the theory and how it works:

Part Two are demonstrations of how it works. Don't miss the dance at the end!

Based on the information so far, we are ready now to discover how to put people into a good state. So the first step in putting people into state is to establish rapport . The second step is to put yourself into the state you want to establish in them.

The next step is to notice what ticks their boxes as you are talking to them. You already have the art of sensory awareness, so now you know how to notice changes in their state.

To get more deeply into their states you also know the Meta Model , so you can use that to “chunk down” on good states! Just ask easy questions like, “What’s it like when you are doing what you love?”, or “What do you love to do?” Just watch them go into state and then ask questions like, “What’s that like?” (At this time you get into the state you want them to access).” For example, “What do you love to do?” They answer “Fishing”. You say “So what’s it like when you are fishing?” They say “Great!” So you say “What kind of great, what do you really love about being there?” Just keep digging for the gold and use your awareness to detect changes.

When you see those changes, anchor it by using your own body and voice to feed it back. You know when you are being successful when they light up as you feed the words and body language back to them.

We trust you 'like' what you/we are doing here and now know more about conversational anchoring.